General
Herzig & Hart, Inc. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 326·United States Customs Court·1955
Ford, J., concurred.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the First Division,
April 4, 1955
No. 58907.
protests 481362-G, etc. (New York).
Herzig & Hart, Inc. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Oliver, C. J.]
Opinion by
Oliver, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Ford, J., concurred.
[DISSENT — Mollison, J.,]
Mollison, J.,
dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, supra.