General

Elizabeth A. Clark, Respondent, v. William H. Pemberton, Appellant

169 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Elizabeth A. Clark, Respondent, v. William H. Pemberton, Appellant. Clark v. Pemberton, 64 App. Div. 416, appeal dismissed. (Argued January 7, 1902; decided January 14, 1902.) Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made October 11, 1901, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate a judgment previously entered in favor of defendant upon the report of a referee and granted such motion. Gustav It. Hamburger and William J. Marshall for appellant. I/ymarn B. Bwvnell for respondent. [MAJORITY] Appeal dismissed, with costs ; no opinion. Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ.