Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Crawford v. Bannan, Warden, 1965 — 381 U.S. 955 · caselaw · US
General
Crawford v. Bannan, Warden
381 U.S. 955·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in Link-letter v. Walker, ante, p. 640.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 513,
Misc.
Crawford v. Bannan, Warden.
Petitioner pro se. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and James R. Ramsey, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. Erwin Ellmann for the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari and other relief denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in Link-letter v. Walker, ante, p. 640.