General
David Weinrib, Respondent, v. Peerless Optical Manufacturing Co., Inc., Louis Conner and Max Shier, Appellants, and Jacob Frummer, Defendant
231 A.D. 744·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1930·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Weinrib, Respondent, v. Peerless Optical Manufacturing Co., Inc., Louis Conner and Max Shier, Appellants, and Jacob Frummer, Defendant
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.