Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clinton Snook, Respondent, v. Ida L. French, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 597 · caselaw · US
General
Clinton Snook, Respondent, v. Ida L. French, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
188 N.Y. 597·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clinton Snook, Respondent, v. Ida L. French, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
(Submitted April 10, 1907;
decided April 30, 1907.)
Snook v. French, 111 App. Div. 910, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 23, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mortgage.
Louis L. Waters and Clarence W. Austin for appellant.
George H. Sears for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.