Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles N. Swift, Appellant, v. The American Exchange National Bank, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 521 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Charles N. Swift, Appellant, v. The American Exchange National Bank, Respondent
186 N.Y. 521·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles N. Swift, Appellant, v. The American Exchange National Bank, Respondent.
Swift v. American Exchange Nat. Bank, 103 App. Div. 610, affirmed.
(Argued June 20, 1906;
decided October 2, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 26, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to impress upon funds in the hands of the defendant a judgment theretofore recovered by plaintiff against a certain corporation, assets of which, it was alleged, had been received by defendant.
Peno B. Qattell, Thomas B. Adams and George I. Carlisle for appellant.
Michael Id. Cardoso for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Cii. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscocic and Chase, J J. Absent: O’Brien, J.