Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. STAFFORD, 1873 — 154 U.S. 590 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES v. STAFFORD
154 U.S. 59021 L. Ed. 117·Supreme Court of the United States·1873
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. STAFFORD.
CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FROM THE CIRCUIT" COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 105.
Argued January 20, 1873.
Decided January 27, 1873.
A certified question is answered coupled with a statement that, through subsequent legislation, it lias ceased to be of any importance.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Chase]
Mr. Chief Justice Chase
delivered the opinion of the court.
Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiff.
Mr. John P. Murray for defendant.
We are all oE the opinion that the question certified in this case must be answered in the negative. As the act of Congress has been so modified that the question has ceased to be of any importance, no comment is thought necessary.