Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. et al. v. Norton, Deputy Commissioner, 1938 — 302 U.S. 767 · caselaw · US
General
Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. et al. v. Norton, Deputy Commissioner
302 U.S. 767·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 630.
Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. et al. v. Norton, Deputy Commissioner.
January 17, 1938.
Messrs. Joseph W. Henderson, Thomas F. Mount, and George M. Brodhead, Jr., for petitioners. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Whitaker, and Mr. Henry A. Julicher for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.