General
Joseph W. Stern and Edward B. Marks, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Jos. W. Stern & Company, Respondents, v. Bernhard Herzmansky, Appellant
161 A.D. 917·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1914·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph W. Stern and Edward B. Marks, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Jos. W. Stern & Company, Respondents, v. Bernhard Herzmansky, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 11th day of November, 1913, denying a motion to vacate an attachment.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The order appealed from should be modified by reducing the amount stated in the warrant of attachment to $1,500, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. McLaughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented, and voted to reverse the order appealed from and to vacate the attachment, on the ground that it does not appear from the papers that the plaintiffs have a cause of action against the defendant. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.