Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Sherry Marie HALE v. STATE of Arkansas

327 Ark. 540938 S.W.2d 858·Arkansas Supreme Court·1997·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Sherry Marie HALE v. STATE of Arkansas CR 97-191 938 S.W.2d 858 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 10, 1997 A. Wayne Davis, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Sherry Marie Hale, by her attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. Her attorney, A. Wayne Davis, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.