Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alabama v. King & Boozer, a Partnership, et al.; and Curry, Commissioner of Revenue, v. United States et al., 1941 — 314 U.S. 599 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Alabama v. King & Boozer, a Partnership, et al.; and Curry, Commissioner of Revenue, v. United States et al.
314 U.S. 599·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 602.
No. 603.
Alabama v. King & Boozer, a Partnership, et al.; and Curry, Commissioner of Revenue, v. United States et al.
October 13, 1941.
Messrs. Thomas S. Lawson, Attorney General of Alabama, John W. Lapsley, and J. Edward Thornton, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Fred L. Blackmon for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama granted.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.
Reported below: 241 Ala. 557, 569; 3 So. 2d 572, 582.