General

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ouseley Crichlow, Appellant

12 A.D.3d 616784 N.Y.S.2d 395·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2004·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ouseley Crichlow, Appellant. [784 NYS2d 395] Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 18, 2003 (People v Crichlow, 302 AD2d 537 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 14, 2000. Ordered that the application is denied. The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur. [Recalled and vacated, see — AD3d —, Feb. 28, 2005.]