Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel M. Pennock et al., Respondents, v. Andrew G. White, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1881 — 85 N.Y. 654 · caselaw · US
General
Samuel M. Pennock et al., Respondents, v. Andrew G. White, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
85 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1881·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel M. Pennock et al., Respondents, v. Andrew G. White, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued. May 5, 1881;
decided June 23, 1881.)
The questions presented in this ease were as to the reception and the rejection of evidence, which were disposed of mainly on the facts and circumstances, no question of interest being presented.
N. C. Moak for appellant.
Edward Savage for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Miller, J.,]
Miller, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.