Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
YOU HEUNG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1929 — 35 F.2d 598 · caselaw · US
General
YOU HEUNG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
35 F.2d 598·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
YOU HEUNG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
November 4, 1929.
No. 5805.
Frank J. Hennessy, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
George J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., and Lucas E. Kilkenny, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal.
Before BUDKIN, DIETBICH, and WlLBUE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.]
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
The record in this ease is in every material respect identical with that considered in No. 5804, Wong Hop v. United States (C. C. A.) 35 F.(2d) 596, this day decided, and herein the same direction is given to the court below as was given in that ease.