Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Appleton Sturgis, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. Allen B. Hendricks et al., Respondents, 1872 — 51 N.Y. 635 · caselaw · US
General
Appleton Sturgis, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. Allen B. Hendricks et al., Respondents
51 N.Y. 635·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Appleton Sturgis, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. Allen B. Hendricks et al., Respondents.
(Argued May 15, 1872;
decided September term, 1872.)
In an action to recover compensation for services in chartering a vessel, evidence as to the customary price charged and paid for such services in the port where the vessel is chartered is proper;
This action was brought to recover compensation for services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff’s intestate, Russell Sturgis, in chartering defendant’s vessel to the United States government.
Plaintiff alleged an agreement to pay a commission of five per cent, and that the services were reasonably worth that amount. The principal contest was upon the question of fact, as to the employment and the agreement for compensation. Plaintiff was allowed to prove, under objection, the customary price in the city of New York for chartering vessels to the government,
William A. Butler for the appellant.
Albert Matthews for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Earl, C.,]
Earl, C.,
reads for reversal of order of General Term, and affirmance of judgment entered upon the report of the referee.
All concur.
Order reversed and judgment accordingly.