Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McGuire et al. v. Equitable Office Building Corp. et al.; and Amott et al. v. Dana et al., 1947 — 331 U.S. 818 · caselaw · US
General
McGuire et al. v. Equitable Office Building Corp. et al.; and Amott et al. v. Dana et al.
331 U.S. 818·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 1168, 1169 and 1170.
Nos. 1172, 1173 and 1174.
McGuire et al. v. Equitable Office Building Corp. et al.; and Amott et al. v. Dana et al.
May 5, 1947.
George T. Barker for petitioners in Nos. 1168, 1169 and 1170. Frank R. Bruce, Henry S. Hooker, T. Fergus Redmond, Sidney R. Nussenfeld and W. Randolph Montgomery for petitioners in Nos. 1172, 1173 and 1174. Charles Green Smith and Herbert J. Jacobi for Dana et al., and T. Roland Berner for Knight et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Reported below: No. 1170, 158 F. 2d 838; No. 1174, 158 F. 2d 982.