Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CASH v. UNITED STATES, 1958 — 357 U.S. 219 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
CASH v. UNITED STATES
357 U.S. 219·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CASH v. UNITED STATES.
No. 723,
Misc.
Decided June 16, 1958.
Eugene Gressman for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for consideration in light of Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674, decided May 26, 1958, and in light of Hill v. United States, 356 U. S. 704, decided June 2, 1958.