Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Virginia E. MacLAUGHLIN, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph S. MacLaughlin, Deceased, Late Collector of Internal Revenue, Defendant-Appellant, v. WESTMORELAND COAL CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, 1934 — 73 F.2d 1004 · caselaw · US
Tax
Virginia E. MacLAUGHLIN, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph S. MacLaughlin, Deceased, Late Collector of Internal Revenue, Defendant-Appellant, v. WESTMORELAND COAL CO., Plaintiff-Appellee
73 F.2d 1004·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Virginia E. MacLAUGHLIN, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph S. MacLaughlin, Deceased, Late Collector of Internal Revenue, Defendant-Appellant, v. WESTMORELAND COAL CO., Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 5537.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Dec. 1, 1934.
George H. Zeutzius, of Washington, D. C., Charles D. MeAvoy, U. S. Atty., and T. J. Curtin, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Philadelphia, Pa., Prank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and E. F. McMahon, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Charles Myers and Barnes, Biddle & Myers, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before WOOLLEY, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Trial by jury was waived, and the case formally submitted to the court. Holding that the stipulated facts sustain the court’s findings, its judgment is affirmed on the reasoning of its opinion. 8 F. Supp. 963.