Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Helene M. Maigille, Frank W. Boyer, Assignee, Respondent, v. Frank H. Leonard, Appellant, 1905 — 181 N.Y. 558 · caselaw · US
General
Helene M. Maigille, Frank W. Boyer, Assignee, Respondent, v. Frank H. Leonard, Appellant
181 N.Y. 558·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Helene M. Maigille, Frank W. Boyer, Assignee, Respondent, v. Frank H. Leonard, Appellant.
Maigille v. Leonard, 102 App. Div. 367, affirmed.
(Argued April 12, 1905;
decided May 2, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 13, 1905, which -affirmed an order of Special Term in supplementary proceedings, directing the defendant to pay over to the sheriff of Kings county a certain sum of money or in default thereof that he be committed to the county jail.
R. W. Newhall and George W. Marti/n for appellant.
J. Stewart Ross for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Crder affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.