General
Jeff Coniber, Doing Business as Jeff Coniber Trucking, Respondent, v. Center Point Transfer Station, Inc., et al., Appellants
82 A.D.3d 1629919 N.Y.S.2d 409·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2011·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jeff Coniber, Doing Business as Jeff Coniber Trucking, Respondent, v Center Point Transfer Station, Inc., et al., Appellants.
[919 NYS2d 409]
[MAJORITY]
Memorandum: Supreme Court properly concluded that it was premature to grant defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint at this stage of the litigation, in view of the limited discovery that has been conducted (see CPLR 3212 [f]; Sportiello v City of New York, 6 AD3d 421 [2004]). We further conclude, however, that the court should have denied the cross motion without prejudice (see Hall v Rite Aid Corp., 37 AD3d 1160 [2007]). We therefore modify the order accordingly. Present — Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Garni, Green and Gorski, JJ.