Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Victoria K. Sweet, Respondent, v. The United States Mutual Accident Association of the City of New York, Appellant, 1888 — 108 N.Y. 635 · caselaw · US
General
Victoria K. Sweet, Respondent, v. The United States Mutual Accident Association of the City of New York, Appellant
108 N.Y. 635·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Victoria K. Sweet, Respondent, v. The United States Mutual Accident Association of the City of New York, Appellant.
(Argued January 17, 1888;
decided January 24, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of New York, made November 11, 188Y, affirming an order of Special Term opening a default herein.
S. W. Eosendale for appellant.
Bermo loewy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.