Administrative
In the Matter of the Claim of Henry G. Zaro, Respondent, against Zaro Tourist and Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc., and Another, Appellants. tate Industrial Board, Respondent
222 A.D. 700·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1927·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Henry G. Zaro, Respondent, against Zaro Tourist and Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc., and Another, Appellants. tate Industrial Board, Respondent.
Workmen’s compensation — appeal dismissed on failure of carrier to procure representation by employer on appeal.
f Motion to dismiss the appeal from an award made by the State Industrial Board on November 12, 1926.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The carrier having been given an opportunity on the argument to procure if possible representation by the employer on this- appeal and having been unable to do so the appeal must be dismissed. (See Matter of Hammele v. McMahon, 220 App. Div. 60.) Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur. Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs against the insurance carrier to the State Industrial Board.