General
Russell Bardin, Sr., Appellant, v. James A. Tuozzolo et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. William C. Smith, Individually and Doing Business as William Smith Construction, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents
190 A.D.2d 1090·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1993·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Russell Bardin, Sr., Appellant, v James A. Tuozzolo et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. William C. Smith, Individually and Doing Business as William Smith Construction, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
— Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Hayes, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hayes, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.