Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WESTERN RESERVE POWER & LIGHT CO. v. CENTRAL EASTERN POWER COMPANY, Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Company, M. J. O'Connell and M. L. Sindeband, as Receivers of Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Company, and Manufacturers' Trust Company, 1934 — 71 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
General
WESTERN RESERVE POWER & LIGHT CO. v. CENTRAL EASTERN POWER COMPANY, Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Company, M. J. O'Connell and M. L. Sindeband, as Receivers of Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Company, and Manufacturers' Trust Company
71 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WESTERN RESERVE POWER & LIGHT CO. v. CENTRAL EASTERN POWER COMPANY, Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Company, M. J. O’Connell and M. L. Sindeband, as Receivers of Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Company, and Manufacturers’ Trust Company.
No. 6486.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 7, 1934.
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Shearman & Sterling, of New York City, for appellant.
Tracy, Chapman & Welles and Marshall, Melhorn, Marlar & Martin, all of Toledo, Ohio, and Wm. P. Moloney, of Marion, Ohio, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed pursuant to stipulation of counsel.