Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John H. Poillon, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York et al., Respondents, 1872 — 47 N.Y. 666 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
John H. Poillon, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York et al., Respondents
47 N.Y. 666·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John H. Poillon, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York et al., Respondents.
The mechanics’ lien law for the city of New York (chap. 513, Laws of 1851, as amended by chap. 404, Laws of 1855) does not give a lien upon a public building, under a contract made by a public officer.
(Argued January 26th, 1872;
decided February 6th, 1872.)
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien alleged to have been acquired upon a school-house in the nineteenth ward in the city of New York. Plaintiff’s intestate was a sub-contractor. The contract was with the school officers of said ward.
B. G. patchings for appellant.
A. B. Bamrence, Jr.¡ for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Grover, J.,]
Grover, J.,
reads opinion for reversal and new trial.
[CONCURRENCE — Church, Ch. J., concurs.]
Church, Ch. J., concurs.
The other members of the court
were of the opinion that the case was not within the statute giving a mechanic’s lien; that it did not give a lien upon a public building under a contract made by public officers. For affirmance, Allen, Peokham, Folger and Rapallo, JJ. Judgment affirmed.