General

Esther La Flamme, Respondent, v. The City of Albany, Appellant; John La Flamme, Respondent, v. The City of Albany, Appellant

151 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Esther La Flamme, Respondent, v. The City of Albany, Appellant. John La Flamme, Respondent, v. The City of Albany, Appellant. Reported below, 91 Hun, 65. (Argued January 18, 1897; decided January 26, 1897.) Motions to dismiss appeals, upon the ground that they are frivolous, from judgments of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, rendered in December, 1895, which affirmed judgments in favor of plaintiff in each of the above-entitled actions, entered, upon the reports of a referee, together with ten per cent damages, or that such ■causes be advanced on the calendar uj>on the ground that all the questions therein have been determined in Jones v. City of Albany (151 N. Y. 223). Parker & Fiero for motion. John A. Delehanty opposed. [MAJORITY] Motions denied, without costs.