Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Scofield et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 821 · caselaw · US
General
Scofield et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
393 U.S. 821·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 273.
Scofield et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
James Urdan for petitioners.
Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board, and Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Harriett R. Taylor, and Stephen I. Schlossberg for International Union, UAW, respondents.
Walter S. Davis for Wisconsin Manufacturers’ Assn, et al., as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
A brief was filed by Illinois Manufacturers Assn., as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted, reserving for decision, after argument, question of whether the petition for writ of certiorari was timely filed.