Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Hollingsworth, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 699 · caselaw · US
General
William Hollingsworth, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant
156 N.Y. 699·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Hollingsworth, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.
Bbllingsworth v. L. I. B. B. Go., 91 Hun, 641, affirmed.
(Argued June 21, 1898;
decided October 4, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 10, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff .entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
William J. Kelly for appellant.
Augustus N. Weller and Jacob Fromme for .respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except O’Briest, J., absent.