Contracts · MBE-tested
Jack Levy, Respondent, v. Anna Rothfeld et al., Defendants, and Charlotte Falk, Appellant
271 A.D.2d 973·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1947·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jack Levy, Respondent, v. Anna Rothfeld et al., Defendants, and Charlotte Falk, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
In an action for specific performance of an agreement for the sale of real property, defendant Charlotte Falk’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was denied. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Hagarty, Acting P. J., concurs but adheres to his views expressed in Joehl v. Tricarico (ante, p. 898); Nolan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and to grant the motion.