General
Arrow Novelty Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protest 66/24572, etc. (New York); Isaac B. Cohen & Son Corp. v. United States, protests 66/27667, etc. (New York); M. Pressner & Co., Inc., and William Shaland Corp. v. United States, protests 66/64072 and 66/1404 (New York)
59 Cust. Ct. 909·United States Customs Court·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. P67/412.
No. P67/413.
No. P67/414.
Arrow Novelty Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protest 66/24572, etc. (New York). Isaac B. Cohen & Son Corp. v. United States, protests 66/27667, etc. (New York). M. Pressner & Co., Inc., and William Shaland Corp. v. United States, protests 66/64072 and 66/1404 (New York).
[MAJORITY — Kiohardson, J.]
Kiohardson, J.
In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of so-called “miniature hunting knives” similar in all material respects to those tbe subject of M. Pressner & Co. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 489, C.D. 2686), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.