Tax
Josephine B. Conroy and Manchester Savings & Trust Co., Executors, Estate of William E. Conroy, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
20 B.T.A. 237·United States Board of Tax Appeals·1930
Seawell dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Josephine B. Conroy and Manchester Savings & Trust Co., Executors, Estate of William E. Conroy, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket Nos. 26242, 32221.
Promulgated July 15, 1930.
H. V. Blaxter, Esq., for the petitioners.
Bruce A. Low, Esq., for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Murdock:]
OPINION.
Murdock:
The respondent has admitted error in disallowing the credit of $126.34, the 2 per cent normal tax paid at the source on interest received by the decedent in 1924.
The respondent’s method of computing the tax on the annual gain from the sale of the decedent’s stock in the Columbia Plate Glass Co. at the normal and surtax rates is approved for the reasons more fully set forth in the companion case to this one, Charles W. Dahlinger, supra.
Judgment will he entered under Rule 50.
Seawell dissents.