Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Douglass Boardman, as Executor, etc., 1894 — 141 N.Y. 560 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Douglass Boardman, as Executor, etc.
141 N.Y. 560·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Douglass Boardman, as Executor, etc.
(Argued December 21, 1893;
decided January 16, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made September 13,1892, which modified, and affirmed as modified, a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Tompkins county.
Willicum N. Noble for appellants.
S. D. HaTliday for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Eabl, J., not voting, and Baetlett, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.