General
Stephen DiMarco, Appellant, v. Patrick J. Bombard, Individually and as a Member of Bombard Buick Pontiac GMC Truck, LLC, et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.); Stephen DiMarco, Appellant, v. Patrick J. Bombard, Individually and as a Member of 100 Main Street, LLC, et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
67 A.D.3d 1459887 N.Y.S.2d 922·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2009·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stephen DiMarco, Appellant, v Patrick J. Bombard, Individually and as a Member of Bombard Buick Pontiac GMC Truck, LLC, et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Stephen DiMarco, Appellant, v Patrick J. Bombard, Individually and as a Member of 100 Main Street, LLC, et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
[887 NYS2d 922]
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered October 2, 2009 (66 AD3d 1341 [2009]) is amended by adding the following sentence as the last sentence of the memorandum: “Even assuming, arguendo, that the affidavit of plaintiffs attorney, which purports to outline the terms of the stipulation, constitutes a sufficient record upon which we may review plaintiffs contention that the court erred in vacating the settlement agreement, we would nevertheless affirm.” Present—Scudder, EJ., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.