Stephen Brown v. Caleb Smith

Stephen Brown v. Caleb Smith. ON certiorari from a justice’s court, in trespass tyuare clausum fregit, the errors relied on were, 1st. That the verdict being for one mill, no judgment could be, or in fact was rendered upon it. 2d. That as no costs were found by the jury, the justice was not warranted in giving judgment for any. Sanford, for the plaintiff, Bogert, contra. [MAJORITY — Per Curtain.] Per Curtain. On the second point it is unnecessary to say any thing* The jury need not find costs 5 they are given by the statute, wherever damages are found. But the judgment must be reversed ; without any law, none could be given on such a verdict 5 it is a nullity and could not be the basis of any judgment. In that which is now rendered, the justice is obliged to reject the verdict, for there is no judgment as to the mill. It is for costs only, and if carried into effect, there could be no levy for the verdict. There is no such currency as the sum given. See Finch’s Law, 29. Shore v. Thomas, Noy Rep. 4. Contra. Marsham v. Buller, 2 Roll. Rep. 21. Vide also 2 Bos. & Pull. 36. Governor, &c. of Harrow School v Alderston.