General
WONG BACK SUE v. CONNELL, Immigration Inspector. Ex parte WONG BACK SUE
225 F. 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WONG BACK SUE v. CONNELL, Immigration Inspector. Ex parte WONG BACK SUE.
No. 2611.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 5, 1915.)
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California.
W. W. Hyams, Thomas A. Sanson, and Duke Stone, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Albert Schoonover, II. S. Atty., and Mansel G. Gallaher, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angelos, Cal., and M. A. Thomas, Asst. U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for noncompliance by appellant with rules 23 and 24 (failure of appellant to print record, under rule 23, and to file a printed brief, under rule 24).