General
In the Matter of the Claim of Arthur Holst, Deceased, Respondent, v. Thomas Abbate, Doing Business as Kropp's Luncheonette, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
25 A.D.2d 577·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1966·NY
Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., eoneur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Arthur Holst, Deceased, Respondent, v. Thomas Abbate, Doing Business as Kropp’s Luncheonette, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
[MAJORITY — Reynolds, J.]
Reynolds, J.
We find involved only issues of fact and credibility which the board could properly resolve as it did and which are not subject to our review since the board’s determinations are supported by substantial evidence (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.
Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., eoneur.