Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harrington EMERSON, Samuel D. I. Emerson, Juliet M. Emerson, and Walter J. Power, trading as Engineers' Mutual Investment, Petitioners, v. R. Bayly CHAPMAN, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of the Spanish-American Cork Products Company, a Corporation, Bankrupt, Respondent, 1924 — 5 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Harrington EMERSON, Samuel D. I. Emerson, Juliet M. Emerson, and Walter J. Power, trading as Engineers' Mutual Investment, Petitioners, v. R. Bayly CHAPMAN, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of the Spanish-American Cork Products Company, a Corporation, Bankrupt, Respondent
5 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harrington EMERSON, Samuel D. I. Emerson, Juliet M. Emerson, and Walter J. Power, trading as Engineers’ Mutual Investment, Petitioners, v. R. Bayly CHAPMAN, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of the Spanish-American Cork Products Company, a Corporation, Bankrupt, Respondent.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
December 19, 1924.)
No. 2315.
Petition to Superintend and Revise, etc. Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, in bankruptcy.
E. P. Keeeh, Jr., of Baltimore, Md., for petitioners. Myer Rosen-bush, of Baltimore, Md., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Case entered dismissed at the cost of the petitioners, under rule 20, in accordance with agreement of attorneys.