Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS, 1910 — 215 U.S. 595 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS
215 U.S. 595·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS.
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN'DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.
No. 597.
Motion to dismiss submitted January 31, 1910.
Decided January 31, 1910.
A certificate in which there was no opinion, judgment or order of the court below dismissed on authority of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission, ante, p. 216.
The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the United States.
No appearance for The Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Certificate dismissed on authority of Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 215 U. S. 216.