Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
County Board of Arlington County et al. v. State Milk Commission, 1954 — 346 U.S. 932 · caselaw · US
General
County Board of Arlington County et al. v. State Milk Commission
346 U.S. 93298 L. Ed. 2d 423·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Mr. Justice Black dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 128.
County Board of Arlington County et al. v. State Milk Commission.
Argued January 4, 1954.
Decided January 18, 1954.
Malcolm D. Miller argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants. Roger J. Whitejord argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were J. Lindsay Almond, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, and Thomas M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Milk Control Board v. Eisenberg Farm Products, 306 U. S. 346.
Mr. Justice Black dissents.