Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of Thomas F. Gilroy, Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, for the Appointment of Commissioners of Appraisal under Chapter 490 of the Laws of 1883. Town of Cortlandt, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent, 1900 — 164 N.Y. 576 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Petition of Thomas F. Gilroy, Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, for the Appointment of Commissioners of Appraisal under Chapter 490 of the Laws of 1883. Town of Cortlandt, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent
164 N.Y. 576·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Thomas F. Gilroy, Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, for the Appointment of Commissioners of Appraisal under Chapter 490 of the Laws of 1883. Town of Cortlandt, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent.
Matter of Gilroy, 43 App. Div. 359, affirmed.
(Submitted October 2, 1900;
decided October 16, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division óf the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October. 3, 1899, affirming two orders of Special Term, the first modifying a report of commissioners of appraisal in condemnation proceedings, nullifying and setting aside an award to the town of Cortlandt, the second denying a motion to resettle the first order.
Frank Manser for appellant.
John Whalen, Corporation Cownsel (Theodore ■ Connol/y and H. T. Dykman of. counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landon, J J.