Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret Caven, as Administratrix of Maria Forgie, Deceased, Appellant, v. The City of Troy, Respondent, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 630 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Margaret Caven, as Administratrix of Maria Forgie, Deceased, Appellant, v. The City of Troy, Respondent
171 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Caven, as Administratrix of Maria Forgie, Deceased, Appellant, v. The City of Troy, Respondent.
(Argued April 1, 1902;
decided April 15, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 22, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
James Lansing for appellant.
Thomas S. Fagan, Corporation Counsel, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight and Martin, JJ. Absent: Parker, Ch. J., and Vann, J.