Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Matthew J. O'Donnell, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1905 — 181 N.Y. 534 · caselaw · US
General
Matthew J. O'Donnell, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
181 N.Y. 534·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Matthew J. O’Donnell, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
O'Donnell v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 90 App. Div. 613, affirmed.
(Argued March 6, 1905;
decided April 11, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department,' entered January 26, 1904, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial. z
Alexander II. Gowie for appellant.
Augtistus G. Stevens and W. S. Jenney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : G-ray, J.