Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Johan BECK-FRIIS, Charge d'Affaires of the Kingdom of Sweden in the United States of America, Appellant, v. William A. MONTEN, Appellee, 1932 — 58 F.2d 1081 · caselaw · US
General
Johan BECK-FRIIS, Charge d'Affaires of the Kingdom of Sweden in the United States of America, Appellant, v. William A. MONTEN, Appellee
58 F.2d 1081·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Johan BECK-FRIIS, Charge d’Affaires of the Kingdom of Sweden in the United States of America, Appellant, v. William A. MONTEN, Appellee.
No. 6750.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 14, 1932.
Sven H. Svenson, of San Francisco, Cal., and Osear W. Houge, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
William A. Monten, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Daniel M. Hunsaker, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Cir■cuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed without costs; mandate forthwith. ■