Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Wagner, Appellant, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent, 1877 — 70 N.Y. 614 · caselaw · US
Administrative
John Wagner, Appellant, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent
70 N.Y. 614·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Wagner, Appellant, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued June 22, 1877;
decided September 25, 1877.)
This action was tried by a jury who rendered a verdict for plaintiff for $325.80. A motion for a new trial on the minutes was made at Circuit and denied, and appeal to the General Term taken from the order and from judgment entered upon the verdict. The General Term reversed the judgment and granted a new trial. (Reported below, 2 Hun, 633.) Held, that there were two insuperable objections in the way of the appeal. First. That an appeal to this court would not lie in such a case. ( Wright v. Hunter, 46 N. Y., 409; Sands v. Crook, id., 567.) Second. That the amount in controversy was less than $500, and this court therefore had no jurisdiction.
George Miller, for appellant.
Robert S. Green, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Rapallo, J.,]
Rapallo, J.,
reads for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.