Bankruptcy
In re A. & W. NESBITT, Limited
285 F. 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1922
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re A. & W. NESBITT, Limited.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 2, 1922.)
No. 102.
Petition to Revise Order of tlie District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In the matter of A. & W. Nesbitt, Limited, alleged bankrupts. A petition in involuntary bankruptcy by Joseph Ullman, Inc., and others, opposed by Simon Jacobson and another, as answering creditors, was sustained, and the adjudication ordered and Morris J. Goldston as attorney for the answering creditors, petitions to revise.
Affirmed.
See, also, 232 Fed. 265.
Rosenthal A Heerrnanee, of New York City (S. Michael Cohen, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioning creditors. Morris J. Goldston, of New York City, for answering creditor.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYEE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CUEIAM.]
PER CUEIAM.
The order entered below is affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of Bradley v. Huntington (C. C. A.) 277 Fed. 948.