Property · MBE-tested

Kendra Hill et al., Respondents, v. New York City Housing Authority, Appellant

186 A.D.2d 380·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1992·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Kendra Hill et al., Respondents, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant. [MAJORITY] — Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.), entered January 2, 1992, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. A question of fact exists as to whether defendant was, or should have been, aware of the alleged dangerous condition of the stairway where plaintiff fell and injured herself (see, Negri v Stop & Shop, 65 NY2d 625). Indeed, defendant’s own employee testified that the stairs were inspected twice a day at the time of the incident. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.