General
HOUCK et al. v. ELMER et al.
253 F. 988·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HOUCK et al. v. ELMER et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
May 23, 1918.)
No. 4805.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
J. D. Johnson, Loomis C. Johnson, Clifford B. Allen, R. P. Williams, C. B. Williams, S. W. Fordyce, Jr., John H. Holliday, Thomas W. White, and Harry A. Frank, all of St. Louis, Mo., Follett W. Bull and Walter M. Johnson, both of Chicago, 111., and Lon O. Hocker, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellants. Henry W. Taft, E. O. Henderson, and Albert Rathbone, all of New York City, and W. F. Evans, Franklin Ferriss, Charles Nagel, Allen, C. Orriek, Thomas Bond, and Blodgett & Rector, all of St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, on motion of appellants and stipulation of parties.