Contracts · MBE-tested
In re POTTASH. Petition of NEW JERSEY HOUSING & CONTRACTING CO.
273 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1921
Before WOOLLEY andi DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re POTTASH. Petition of NEW JERSEY HOUSING & CONTRACTING CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
June 24, 1921.)
No. 2725.
Petition to Revise and Review an Order of the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; John Rellstab, Judge. In the matter of David Pottash, individually and trading as Clayton Shoddy & Cotton Mills, bankrupt; Willis T. Porch, trustee. On petition by the New Jersey Housing & Contracting Company to revise and review an order of the District Court.
Order affirmed.
Carr & Carroll, of Camden, N. J., for petitioner. Bilder & Bilder, of Newark, N. J., for trustee. Willis T. Porch, of Pitman, N. J., for respondent.
Before WOOLLEY andi DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.]
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the District Court of the United States, for the District of New Jersey, and. was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed by this Court, that the order of the said District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby affirmed with costs.