Contracts · MBE-tested

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. REYNALDO ARROYO

284 Conn. 938·Connecticut Supreme Court·2007·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. REYNALDO ARROYO Decided November 15, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18031. Andrew S. Liskov, special public defender, in support of the petition. Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. [MAJORITY] The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn. App. 167 (AC 28044), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the special credibility instruction mandated in State v. Patterson, 276 Conn. 452, 886 A.2d 777 (2005), was not applicable? “2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the verdicts were not legally inconsistent?” SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.