General
Morris H. TESSLER v. Philip FEINSTETN and Max Lesnick, Copartners, Morris Tuekel, and Max Gootesman
4 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Morris H. TESSLER v. Philip FEINSTETN and Max Lesnick, Copartners, Morris Tuekel, and Max Gootesman.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 6, 1925.)
No. 4236.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Charles C. Simons, Judge.
Corliss, Leote & Moody, of Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff in error. Fixel & Pixel, of Detroit, Mich., for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of the District Court affirmed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.